... به پایگاه اطلاع رسانی فصلنامه دانش و تندرستی خوش آمدید            ... به پایگاه اطلاع رسانی فصلنامه دانش و تندرستی خوش آمدید  
  صفحه اصلی  |   تماس با ما  |   آرشیو مجله  |   نقشه سایت  |   عضویت  |   ارسال مقاله  |   پیگیری مقاله  |   English تاريخ: 3/9/1396
نام كاربري
كلمه ورود
درخواست عضویت
کلمه ورود را فراموش کرده ام

صاحب امتیاز:
دانشگاه علوم پزشکی وخدمات بهداشتی - درمانی شاهرود
مدیر مسئول: دکتر ‌جواد نوریان
سردبیر: دکتر سهراب حاجی‌‌‌زاده
مدیر اجرایی: احمد خسروی

آدرس: شاهرود- میدان هفتم تیر- ساختمان مرکزی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شاهرود– معاونت آموزشی، پژوهشی– دفتر مجله دانش و تندرستی
تلفن: 3394111-0273
نمابر: 3394800-0273
پست الکترونیک: m_jdanesh@yahoo.com

صفحه نخست :: صفحه قبل

جستجوی پیشرفته جدید

Journal Title: بهار 1388
Article title: The Comparison of Rapid E-Learning Approach and Traditional E-Learning in Staff In-Service Training in Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Article File:  متن کامل (PDF) 354 Kb 
Page From: 16 To: 23      
Visit: 1463

Article abstract:
Introduction: As there are few studies that compare rapid e-learning with traditional e-learning this study was carried out in Tehran University of Medical Science in 1387 in order to compare learning rate trainees satisfaction and the time consumed to develop training courses in these two approaches. Methods: In this interventional study 100 employees were assessed in two 50- staff groups by blocking randomization one group learned through traditional e-learning and the other by rapid e-learning. The traditional e-learning content development was based on waterfall instructional design by Macromedia flash software. The rapid e-learning content development was based on parallel process of three stages of analysis design and development by Adobe Presenter software. The data were collected by pre test post test final examination; self- report questionnaire of learning and questionnaire of trainees satisfaction. Results: There was no significant difference between pre test post test final examination scores and self report of learning of the two groups nor was there significant difference between satisfaction of content delivery method e-learning program and overall satisfaction in the two groups. The consumed time for developing the course in traditional and rapid e-learning approaches was 141 working days and 24 working days respectively. Conclusion: The staff learning and satisfaction were not different in these two e-learning approaches but the time needed for content development in rapid e-learning approach was much less compared to the other approach. Therefore it is recommended that rapid e-learning be used in electronic staff in-service training in universities.

Article keyWords:
Rapid e-learning Traditional e-learning satisfaction Employee

Article Authors:
Seyd-Shohre AlaviFirst Author
Esa ebrahim-ZadeOther Author
Davoud Karimzadegan-MoghaddamOther Author
Mohammad AttaranOther Author
Ramin MehrdadOther Author
Banafshe golestanOther Author




بالای صفحه
صفحه اصلی  |   تماس با ما  |   آرشیو مجله  |   نقشه سایت  |   عضویت  |   ارسال مقاله  |   پیگیری مقاله

استفاده از مطالب این سایت با ذکر نام سایت مجاز می باشد   -   Copyright © 2007 2009 - Last Update 5-11-2009
Powered By www.itpco.net    www.itpco.ir
( ITPCO ) شرکت توسعه انفورماتیک ایران
تولید کننده سیستم های تخصصی مدیریت نشریات و همایش ها و مورد تائید کمیسیون نظارت بر نشریات پزشکی وزارت بهداشت درمان و آموزش پزشکی کشور